Note

    solo-mom-project-design-audit-final-annotated-2026-03-06

    Solo Mom Project UX/UI Design Audit Version: Final handoff edition with annotated screenshots and diagrams Date: 2026-03-06 10:09 ET (America/...

    Dates

    Created
    Not recorded
    Last updated
    Not recorded

    Document Metadata

    • Version: Final handoff edition with annotated screenshots and diagrams
    • Date: 2026-03-06 10:09 ET (America/New_York)
    • Repository: smc-directory Prepared
    • for: Claude implementation handoff 1) Scope and Method This audit evaluates the public UX/UI system and defines an implementation-ready path for refinement. Homepage (/) Re

    Solo Mom Project UX/UI Design Audit Version: Final handoff edition with annotated screenshots and diagrams Date: 2026-03-06 10:09 ET (America/New_York) Repository: smc-directory Prepared for: Claude implementation handoff

    1. Scope and Method This audit evaluates the public UX/UI system and defines an implementation-ready path for refinement. Homepage (/) Resources (/resources) Category (/categories/mental-health) Detail (/resources/postpartum-support-international-psi) About (/about) Repository code review (public components, route shells, token usage). Live browser verification (desktop and mobile). Touch-target and interaction checks on key journeys.
    2. Executive Summary The public experience is structurally strong and coherent. Navigation, category framing, and detail- page orientation are clear. The most important remaining work is concentrated in accessibility and interaction quality, especially on mobile. Top risks: undersized touch targets, incomplete dialog semantics, and card/action inconsistency. Primary objective: enforce a single accessibility and interaction contract across all public routes.
    3. Severity Findings Priority Finding Implementation Direction P0 Interactive controls fall below 44x44 touch target on core mobile journeys. Normalize all tappable controls (header, filter triggers, card utility actions, footer links) to minimum touch- size contract. P0 Dialog/sheet accessibility semantics require hardening. Ensure all dialog/sheet content has robust description semantics and keyboard-safe behavior.

    -- 1 of 9 --

    Priority Finding Implementation Direction P1 No skip-link path in public shell. Add visible-on-focus skip navigation anchored to the main content landmark. P1 Footer lacks complete legal/trust pathway set. Add privacy, terms, contact, and trust/social utilities with clear grouping. P1 Detail-page action clusters repeat and dilute hierarchy. Keep one primary conversion zone; reduce duplicate CTA groupings. P2 Card families remain fragmented across modules. Define canonical card families and normalize anatomy

    • action slots. P2 Token docs and runtime values are not fully aligned. Reconcile design-token documentation with the live source-of-truth token contract.
    1. Annotated Screenshots Figure 1. Homepage desktop: strong navigation and hero hierarchy; compact utility controls flagged.

    -- 2 of 9 --

    Figure 2. Category desktop: sidebar framing works; filter and card utility target sizes are key refinement points.

    -- 3 of 9 --

    Figure 3. Detail desktop: orientation is clear; action hierarchy below fold should be simplified.

    -- 4 of 9 --

    Figure 4. Directory mobile: filter entry point exists, but touch targets are compact. Figure 5. Detail mobile: orientation and profile readability are strong; utility sizing remains a priority.

    -- 5 of 9 --

    -- 6 of 9 --

    Figure 6. About mobile: messaging is strong; CTA/header utilities should conform to touch-size contract. 5) Diagrams

    -- 7 of 9 --

    Figure 7. Priority matrix (impact vs effort) for A-01 to A-09 implementation annotations. Figure 8. Recommended execution flow to sequence high-impact UX/UI changes safely.

    -- 8 of 9 --

    1. Annotated Implementation Map
    1. A-01 Header utility touch targets: raise search/menu and utility controls to >=44x44.
    2. A-02 Card utility icon actions: expand external/bookmark/share hit areas in card modules.
    3. A-03 Detail share action size: align with same touch-size contract.
    4. A-04 Dialog/sheet semantics: ensure complete description semantics and robust keyboard flow.
    5. A-05 Skip-link: implement visible-on-focus skip path to main content.
    6. A-06 Footer trust pathways: add legal/privacy/contact/social utility group.
    7. A-07 Detail CTA simplification: remove redundant action clusters and preserve one primary zone.
    8. A-08 Card family consolidation: normalize anatomy and action placement across modules.
    9. A-09 Token alignment: reconcile documentation with live token values and workflow.
    1. Recommended Delivery Order for Claude
    1. Accessibility baseline (A-01, A-03, A-04, A-05).
    2. Action hierarchy and detail-page CTA cleanup (A-07).
    3. Footer trust completion (A-06).
    4. Card system consolidation (A-02, A-08).
    5. Token governance reconciliation (A-09). This document is intentionally standalone and implementation-oriented for direct Claude handoff.

    -- 9 of 9 --

    Provenance